Case 2.1

Conditions:

· Without rudder

· Calm water conditions

· FX₀

· Re = 1.4×10⁷, Fr = 0.26

Reference:

(2-2) Van, S.H., Kim, W.J., Yim, G.T., Kim, D.H., and Lee, C.J., (1998b), "Experimental Investigation of the Flow Characteristics Around Practical Hull Forms," Proceedings 3rd Osaka Colloquium on Advanced CFD Applications to Ship Flow and Hull Form Design, Osaka, Japan

(2-3) Kim, W.J., Van, D.H. and Kim, D.H., (2001), “Measurement of flows around modern commercial ship models”, Exp. in Fluids, Vol. 31, pp 567-578

Table/ Figure #	Items	EFD Data		Submission Instruction
Table/ Figure #	Items	Data + Tecplot layout file	Image	Image file	Sample + Tecplot layout file
2.1-1	Wave elevation contours (global wave field)	wp_EFD.dat wp_global_EFD.lpk	wp_global_EFD.jpg	Filename: [Identifier]_wp_global_2-1.jpg Range: -0.1 ≤ x/L_PP ≤ 2.0; -0.5 ≤ y/L_PP ≤ 0 Contours level: -0.005 ≤ z/L_PP ≤ 0.01, ∆z=0.0005, #levels = 31 Contours style: Solid and dashed lines for positive and negative values, respectively.	Refer to EFD image for details
2.1-2	Wave elevation contours (bow wave field)	wp_EFD.dat wp_bow_EFD.lpk	wp_bow_EFD.jpg	Filename: [Identifier]_wp_bow_2-1.jpg Range: 0 ≤ x/L_PP ≤ 0.16; -0.12 ≤ y/L_PP ≤ 0 Contours level: -0.005 ≤ z/L_PP ≤ 0.01, ∆z=0.0005, #levels = 31 Contours style: Solid and dashed lines for positive and negative values, respectively.	Refer to EFD image for details
2.1-3	Wave elevation contours (stern wave field)	wp_EFD.dat wp_stern_EFD.lpk	wp_stern_EFD.jpg	Filename: [Identifier]_wp_stern_2-1.jpg Range: 1.0 ≤ x/L_PP ≤ 1.2; -0.15 ≤ y/L_PP ≤ 0 Contours level: -0.005 ≤ z/L_PP ≤ 0.01, ∆z=0.0005, #levels = 31 Contours style: Solid and dashed lines for positive and negative values, respectively.	Refer to EFD image for details
2.1-4	Wave profile on the hull	wave_prof_EFD.dat	Refer to sample file for details	Filename: [Identifier]_wave_prof_2-1.jpg Axis: -0.1 ≤ x/L_PP ≤ 2.0 -0.015 ≤ z/L_PP ≤ 0.02 Line style: CFD solid line; EFD open circles	[Identifier]_wave_prof_2-1.jpg wave_prof_2-1.lpk
2.1-5	Longitudinal wave cut at y/Lpp= -0.0741	wave_cut_y-0741_EFD.dat	Refer to sample file for details	Filename: [Identifier]_wave_cut_ y-0741_2-1.jpg Axis: -0.5 ≤ x/L_PP≤ 2.0 -0.01 ≤ z/L_PP ≤ 0.01 Line style: CFD solid line; EFD open circles	[Identifier]_wave_cut_ y-0741_2-1.jpg wave_cut_ y-0741_2-1.lpk
2.1-6	Longitudinal wave cut at y/Lpp= -0.1509	wave_cut_y-1509_EFD.dat	Refer to sample file for details	Filename: [Identifier]_wave_cut_ y-1509_2-1.jpg Axis: -0.5 ≤ x/L_PP≤ 2.0 -0.01 ≤ z/L_PP ≤ 0.01 Line style: CFD solid line; EFD open circles	[Identifier]_wave_cut_ y-1509_2-1.jpg wave_cut_ y-1509_2-1.lpk
2.1-7	Longitudinal wave cut at y/Lpp= -0.4224	wave_cut_y-4224_EFD.dat	Refer to sample file for details	Filename: [Identifier]_wave_cut_ y-4224_2-1.jpg Axis: -0.5 ≤ x/L_PP≤ 2.0 -0.01 ≤ z/L_PP ≤ 0.01 Line style: CFD solid line; EFD open circles	[Identifier]_wave_cut_ y-4224_2-1.jpg wave_cut_ y-4224_2-1.lpk
2.1-8	Axial velocity contours (right panel), cross flow vectors and streamlines (left panel) at x/L_PP= 0.9825	x-09825_EFD.dat x-09825_EFD.lpk	x-09825_EFD.jpg	Filename: [Identifier]_x-09825_2-1.jpg Axis: -0.07 ≤ y/L_PP≤ 0.07 -0.06 ≤ z/L_PP ≤ 0 Contours level: 0.4 ≤ U ≤ 1.0 ∆U=0.05, #levels=13 Contours style: Solid lines Streamlines: Solid lines	Refer to EFD image for details
2.1-9	Velocity on the propeller plane (x/L_PP= 0.9825) at z/L_PP= -0.0302	uvw_prop_EFD.dat	Refer to sample file for details	Filename: [Identifier]_uvw_prop_2-1.jpg Axis: -0.05 ≤ y/L_PP ≤ 0.0 -0.4 ≤ u/U, v/U, w/U ≤ 1.2 Line style: u/U: CFD solid line; EFD open squares v/U: CFD dashed line; EFD open circles w/U: CFD dotted line; EFD open triangles	[Identifier]_uvw_prop_2-1.jpg uvw_prop_2-1.lpk

Submission Instructions:

· [Identifier] should be [Institute Name]-[Solver Name]. For example, if your institute is Chalmers and solver is SHIPFLOW4.2, identifier should be Chalmers-SHIPFLOW4.2

Identifier in the Figure should be [Institute Name]/[Solver Name]. For example, if your institute is Chalmers and solver is SHIPFLOW4.2, identifier should be Chalmers/SHIPFLOW4.2

· All figures should have aspect ratio of 1:1

· All figures should be in black and white

· Authors may change the contour levels for better qualitative comparison